☰ SectionsYour daily read on the news.
Viral Media Live · 50 North Laura Street, Suite 2500, Jacksonville, FL 32202

Victorian Court Denies Inmate Appeal Against Decade-Old Vegemite Ban

A Supreme Court judge ruled that prison regulations limiting the yeast spread to detect contraband outweigh a life-sentenced prisoner's cultural claims.

By Jason Wood ·

Illustration for: Victorian Court Denies Inmate Appeal Against Decade-Old Vegemite Ban
Illustration generated for this article, not a news photograph.

A Victorian Supreme Court judge rejected an appeal on Monday by a man seeking to reinstate access to Vegemite in state prisons. The decision ends a legal challenge that lasted years and confirms that the restrictive food policy remains in effect for inmates in the state.

Andre McKechnie, 54, argued that the ban, which has been active since 2006, interfered with his ability to maintain his Australian cultural identity. McKechnie serves a life sentence for the 1990s murder of a property developer in Queensland. He was later transferred to a Victorian facility, where he filed a claim against the Department of Justice and Corrections. He contended that the prohibition violated legislation requiring prisons to provide food that supports inmate health and well-being.

The judge dismissed the claim, stating that McKechnie had not proven the ban breached those standards. The court found that the prisoner's cultural rights were primarily limited by his imprisonment status. The ruling stands as a final determination on the matter for McKechnie.

Corrections Victoria defended the rule by citing operational security concerns. Officials told the court that the strong odor of the yeast spread can mask the scent of contraband substances. The department also noted that the smell can distract sniffer dogs used to detect drugs during entry searches. This evidence was central to the court's acceptance of the administrative rationale behind the restriction.

The restriction is not unique to Victoria. Jails in Queensland, South Australia, and Tasmania also prohibit the spread. The product, first sold in Melbourne in 1923 as a Marmite alternative, remains a controversial item in Australian food culture. Its status as a national symbol complicates its exclusion from prison diets.

The ban recently entered public discourse again following a dispute in Canada last April. An Australian cafe owner in Canada was told to remove the product from shelves due to local health regulations. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese intervened, describing the exclusion as odd since Marmite is permitted. The owner was eventually granted permission to continue selling the spread, a resolution that highlighted the product's cultural weight beyond the prison walls.

Source: BBC News

More Business · World news · Bad Service · Report a business

Get Viral Media Live in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.

Get Viral Media Live in your inboxYour daily read on the news. Free, a few times a week, unsubscribe any time.